🛠️ Corrections & Complaints Policy
Our Commitment to Accuracy
At UK-Safety.News, accuracy and fairness are at the heart of everything we publish.
We work hard to ensure every article is verified, clearly sourced, and presented responsibly.
However, if we ever get something wrong, we are committed to correcting the record quickly and transparently.
Requesting a Correction
If you believe an article contains inaccurate or misleading information, please let us know by emailing:
📧 editor@uk-safety.news
When submitting a correction request, please include:
-
The article title and publication date
-
A link to the page in question
-
A brief description of the inaccuracy or concern
-
Any supporting evidence, documentation, or official statement (if available)
Our editorial team will review your request within 3 working days.
If a correction is warranted, we will amend the article and note the change at the bottom of the page with a “Correction Notice” and a timestamp of when the edit was made.
Correction Policy
-
Minor factual corrections (e.g., spelling, titles, locations) are silently updated unless they materially affect the meaning of the story.
-
Significant corrections (e.g., misquotations, misstated facts, misattributed sources) will include a visible note explaining the change.
-
Content retractions (in the rare event that an article is withdrawn) will be marked as such with a clear reason provided to readers.
We never delete stories to conceal errors — transparency is part of our credibility.
Complaints and Editorial Concerns
If you wish to raise a broader complaint — for example, about bias, unfair representation, or breach of editorial standards — please contact:
📧 complaints@uk-safety.news
Your message will be reviewed by a senior editor not involved in the article’s publication.
We aim to acknowledge all formal complaints within 5 working days and provide a full response within 14 working days.
Where appropriate, we may consult external references or governing standards such as IPSO’s Editors’ Code of Practice to assess the issue.
Appeals
If you are not satisfied with the outcome of a complaint or correction request, you may request an independent internal review.
This review will be handled by a senior editor or advisor who was not involved in the original editorial decision.
Our goal is always to resolve concerns fairly, respectfully, and in good faith.
Transparency Record
All significant corrections and retractions are logged internally for ongoing quality review.
This helps us identify recurring issues and continuously improve our editorial process.